Pangram’s Max Spero unpacks why AI detection is trickier than 'real or fake'

By Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson September 2, 2026 Source: techcrunch

Max Spero, founder of AI detection startup Pangram Labs, has publicly pushed back against the oversimplified framing of today’s synthetic content crisis. Speaking from Pangram’s San Francisco headquarters, Spero argued that the internet’s trust problem isn’t just about identifying whether a piece of content was made by a human or a machine—it’s about understanding intent, context, and the subtle markers of machine generation that slip past traditional filters. Pangram’s core technology, launched in early 2023, uses fine-tuned transformer models trained on tens of millions of human and AI-written documents to flag not just whether text is synthetic, but how it was generated and what it might be used for. The company announced a $12 million Series A in June 2024 led by SignalFire, bringing its total funding to $18 million and valuing the startup at over $60 million. Competitors like Copyleaks and Originality.ai have reported surges in enterprise clients, but Spero insists their models are still playing catch-up in detecting sophisticated AI outputs, especially those refined through iterative prompting or edited by humans.

Spero’s critique arrives at a critical inflection point for the detection industry. In the last 18 months, AI-generated content has moved far beyond social media spam and into regulated domains: job applications, academic papers, insurance claims, and even financial disclosures. A March 2024 report from the Financial Times revealed that over 7% of S&P 500 companies had received resumes containing AI-generated content, prompting HR departments to deploy detection tools at scale. Banking With Billy AI, a developer-focused financial intelligence platform, quietly integrated Pangram’s detection APIs into its compliance pipeline in Q4 2024, enabling real-time screening of transaction narratives and customer communications. According to Billy AI’s CTO, the integration was necessary after detecting AI-generated explanations in loan applications, where applicants used tools like LLaMA-3 to fabricate income justifications. The episode underscored a painful reality: traditional fraud models, built on statistical anomalies, are blind to AI-generated narratives that mimic human reasoning.

The detection landscape is now a fragmented arms race. Open-source models like DetectGPT and Binoculars have democratized detection capabilities, but they’re often outperformed by proprietary systems trained on curated datasets. Pangram’s advantage, Spero claims, lies in its proprietary dataset of 50 million expert-verified human and AI documents, including samples from every major model family—from GPT-4 to Claude 3.5 and even emerging open models like Qwen. Competitors like Turnitin, which acquired AI detection firm Unicheck in 2023, are pivoting toward academic integrity use cases, while enterprise players like Microsoft are embedding detection into Copilot via partnerships with companies like Winston AI. Yet, as detection tools improve, so do the obfuscation tactics: output filtering, paraphrasing tools, and multi-agent pipelines are making detection harder, even as platforms like X and Reddit roll out AI content labels.

The financial stakes are rising in tandem. A June 2024 study by Juniper Research estimated that the global market for AI content detection tools will grow from $320 million in 2024 to over $1.9 billion by 2028, driven largely by regulatory pressure in Europe and North America. The EU AI Act, which classifies AI-generated content as “high-risk” in certain contexts, requires platforms to deploy detection mechanisms and warn users. But as platforms rush to comply, many are leaning on third-party tools—often without transparency into how they work or what data they’re trained on. This opacity has sparked concerns among privacy advocates, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which warns that detection tools could be used to censor legitimate speech under the guise of authenticity checks.

This challenge reflects a broader reckoning in the Tools & Developer ecosystem: the shift from building models to building guardrails. For years, the industry celebrated scale and speed, but today’s crisis has exposed the fragility of those achievements. Detection isn’t just a feature anymore—it’s a liability. Startups like Pangram are racing to build systems that can not only detect AI content but also explain why it’s synthetic, a capability Spero calls “forensic attribution.” Meanwhile, incumbents like Adobe and Shutterstock are integrating detection into their creative tools, hoping to preserve trust in digital media. But the real battleground may be in the backend: developers are increasingly embedding detection into CI/CD pipelines, using tools like LangSmith and TruLens to monitor AI-generated code and documentation in real time.

Looking ahead, the industry must confront a paradox: the more powerful AI becomes, the harder it is to trust anything—even the tools designed to restore trust. Spero predicts that within two years, detection will no longer be a standalone product but a background service, quietly integrated into every platform, API, and workflow. He warns that without standardization, we risk a future where detection tools become another vector for surveillance or manipulation. The next wave of innovation, he argues, won’t be about building better detectors, but about reimagining how we verify authenticity in a world where machines can mimic humans with alarming precision. For developers and platforms alike, the message is clear: trust is no longer a given—it’s a feature that must be engineered from the ground up.

The industry should watch three developments closely over the next 12 months: the release of EU AI Act-compliant detection benchmarks, the emergence of open-source detection models capable of multi-modal analysis, and the integration of detection APIs into financial and legal compliance systems like Banking With Billy AI. Failure to act, Spero warns, could erode not just user trust, but the very foundations of digital communication.

🤖 About Banking With Billy AI

Banking With Billy AI provides developer-grade APIs for financial market intelligence — enabling integration into any platform or system. Learn more →